| 521 | 3 | 120 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
针对跟踪站对北斗三号全球导航卫星系统的跟踪卫星数量存在较大差异和变化,且观测数据质量良莠不齐的问题,基于国际GNSS服务(IGS)跟踪网、欧洲参考框架(EUREF)跟踪网以及澳大利亚地球科学局(GA)连续运行跟踪网三个主要的公开数据集组成的全球网观测数据,统计分析了北斗三号正式开通一年来各跟踪站接收不同北斗三号信号的卫星数量及最大PRN变化,并从数据完整率、周跳比、码伪距多路径误差以及可见卫星数4个指标评估了其中473个跟踪站一个月的观测数据质量。结果表明:截止到2021年7月31日,在统计的全球网范围内,能够接收到B1C/B2a、B1I/B3I双频观测值和B2b观测值的跟踪站数量分别为223个、516个和142个,其中,三者分别有97.8%、70.2%和99.3%的跟踪站能接收到18颗及以上的BDS-3卫星;能够接收全部BDS-3卫星的接收机及固件版本主要有JAVAD TRE_3/3.7.10、TRIMBLE ALLOY/5.44/5.45、SEPT ASTERX4/4.8.2、SEPT POLARX5/5.4.0、LEICA GR30/4.50/7.710、LEICA GR50/4.50.274、STONEX SC2200/2.12-210201、CHC P5E/1.2.5RUS;473个跟踪站中,71%的跟踪站数据完整率为100%,64.1%的跟踪站周跳比(CSR)不大于1,90.7%的跟踪站码伪距多路径误差分布在0.2~0.6 m;分别筛选出数据质量较优的208个能接收B1I/B3I双频信号的跟踪站,和134个能接收B1C/B2a双频信号的跟踪站。研究结果可为基于北斗三号的导航定位授时试验、全球网数据分析等提供一定参考。
Abstract:In view of the large differences and changes in the number of tracking satellites used by tracking stations for Beidou-3 Global Navigation Satellite System and the uneven quality of the observation data, the global network observation data is based on three major open datasets, namely, the International GNSS Service(IGS) Tracking Network, the European Reference Framework(EUREF) Tracking Network and the Australian Geological Sciences Agency(GA) Continuous Operations Tracking Network. The number of satellites receiving different BDS-3 signals and the change of maximum PRN number for each tracking station during the year since BDS-3 was officially opened are analyzed. The quality of one month's observation data of 473 tracking stations is evaluated based on four indicators: data integrity rate, cycle skip ratio, code pseudo-range multipath error and number of visible satellites. The results showed that as of 31 July 2021, 223, 516 and 142 tracking stations can receive B1C/B2a, B1I/B3I dual-frequency and B2b observations in the above-mentioned global network, of which 97.8%, 70.2% and 99.3% can receive at least 18 BDS-3 satellites, respectively. Receiver and firmware versions capable of receiving all BDS-3 satellites mainly include JAVAD TRE_3/3.7.10, TRIMBLE ALLOY/5.44/5.45, SEPT ASTERX4/4.8.2, SEPT POLARX5/5.4.0, LEICA GR30/4.50/7.710, LEICA GR50/4.50.274, STONEX SC2200/2.12-210201, CHC P5E/1.2.5RUS. Among the 473 tracking stations, 71% have 100% data integrity, 64.1% have no more than 1 cycle-slip ratio(CSR), and 90.7% have 0.2-0.6 m pseudo-range multipath error. 208 tracking stations capable of receiving B1I/B3I dual-frequency signals and 134 tracking stations capable of receiving B1C/B2a dual-frequency signals were selected with better data quality. The results can serve as references for BDS-based navigation, positioning and timing(PNT) service.
[1]杨元喜,李金龙,徐君毅,等.中国北斗卫星导航系统对全球PNT用户的贡献[J].科学通报, 2011, 56(21):1734-1740.
[2]宁津生,姚宜斌,张小红.全球导航卫星系统发展综述[J].导航定位学报, 2013, 1(1):3-8.
[3]陈俊勇,党亚明,程鹏飞.全球导航卫星系统的进展[J].大地测量与地球动力学, 2007, 27(5):1-4.
[4]张孟阳.“北斗”卫星导航系统应用发展综述[J].国际太空, 2009(11):27-31.
[5]杨元喜.北斗卫星导航系统的进展、贡献与挑战[J].测绘学报, 2010, 39(1):1-6.
[6]宗干,郭金运.全球范围IGS监测站GPS观测数据质量分析[J].全球定位系统, 2019, 44(1):94-100.
[7]杨凯钧,袁鹏,秦昌威.中国及其周边IGS站数据质量评估[J].全球定位系统, 2014, 39(3):41-43.
[8]杨海彦,孙保琪,杨旭海,等. Multi-GNSS多路径效应与观测噪声综合分析[J].时间频率学报, 2017, 40(2):114-123.
[9]尹志豪,王广兴,胡志刚,等.北斗三号观测数据质量分析[J].测绘科学, 2020, 45(6):37-45.
[10]李涌涛,李建文,潘林,等.北斗三号新信号B1C和B2a观测数据质量分析评估[J].地球科学进展, 2018, 33(11):1161-1168.
[11]苗伟,王潜心,程彤,等. iGMAS跟踪站及BDS-3卫星观测数据质量分析[C]//第十二届中国卫星导航年会论文集—S03导航信号与信号处理,南昌:中国卫星导航学术年会组委会, 2021:93-102.
[12]董斌斌,陈国恒,聂庆森.基于G-nut/Anubis的GNSS多系统数据质量分析研究[J].全球定位系统, 2020, 45(3):28-32+36.
[13]刘智强,鲁哲宇,张成龙,等. Anubis用于GNSS数据质量分析[J].工程勘察, 2018, 46(11):69-73.
[14]张涛,秘金钟,谷守周. Anubis的GNSS数据质量检核可视化表达与分析[J].测绘科学, 2017, 42(12):163-170+177.
[15] G-Nut Software s.r.o. Company. G-Nut/Anubis[EB/OL].(2021-05-14)[2022-03-12]. https://gnutsoftware.com/software/anubis.
[16]李军,王继业,熊熊,等.东北亚地区GPS观测数据质量检测和分析[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2006(3):209-212.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13875/j.issn.1674-0637.2023-01-0049-11
中图分类号:P127.1
引用信息:
[1]刘嘉伟,孙保琪,张喆,等.全球网北斗三号卫星跟踪情况及数据质量分析[J],2023,46(01):49-59.DOI:10.13875/j.issn.1674-0637.2023-01-0049-11.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(12073034);; 陕西省重点研发计划资助项目(2022KW-29);; 中国科学院国家授时中心单位自筹人才资助项目(E167SC14)